Choose the academic term that best completes each sentence.
1............... the dates recorded in the official archive, the newly discovered correspondence reduced concern that the chronology had been reconstructed retrospectively.
Wrong!
"Corroborating" means providing independent evidence that confirms the recorded dates.
2Because the sampling frame excluded rural schools and no invariance analysis was conducted, the findings should not be ............... beyond urban populations.
Wrong!
"generalised" refers to extending findings from the studied sample to a wider population.
3Rather than dismissing the two results as inconsistent, the review seeks to ............... them by demonstrating that they concern different populations.
Wrong!
"reconcile" means showing how apparently conflicting findings can be compatible.
4Pending direct evidence for the mechanism, the authors ............... that changes in reporting practices produced the apparent trend.
Wrong!
"posit" presents the mechanism as a provisional explanation rather than an established fact.
5Before collecting data, the team had to ............... “social cohesion” by mapping the abstract construct onto observable indicators.
Wrong!
"operationalise" means defining an abstract construct in terms that permit measurement.
6Although the evidence supports the central argument, the low response rate ............... the conclusion by narrowing the population to which it can defensibly apply.
Wrong!
"qualifies" limits the scope or strength of a claim without completely rejecting it.
7Pre-existing household income, which may independently influence both educational choice and later earnings, is treated as a potential ............... variable.
Wrong!
"confounding" describes a variable associated with both the exposure and the outcome, potentially distorting their apparent relationship.
8Although the report never explicitly claims that causation has been established, its repeated use of “led to” appears to ............... precisely that conclusion.
Wrong!
"imply" is correct because wording conveys a conclusion indirectly; readers, rather than wording, infer conclusions.
9Although the estimated effect is statistically significant at p < .01, its magnitude is too small to be ............... significant for policy.
Wrong!
"substantively" concerns the practical importance of an effect, as distinct from its statistical significance.
10The authors acknowledge that their mutually exclusive coding categories may ............... culturally specific distinctions by collapsing nuanced responses into broad groups.
Wrong!
"obscure" means making distinctions less visible or clear, as the collapsing of nuanced responses suggests.
11The model’s predictions depend on boundary conditions ............... a priori rather than established empirically.
Wrong!
"stipulated" means specified in advance, matching the cue "a priori".
12By synthesising estimates from several small studies, the meta-analysis aims to ............... a more precise pooled effect.
Wrong!
"derive" means obtaining an estimate through analysis or calculation from the available evidence.
Exercise complete
0 out of 12
correct answers
Answers
- Corroborating the dates recorded in the official archive, the newly discovered correspondence reduced concern that the chronology had been reconstructed retrospectively.
- Because the sampling frame excluded rural schools and no invariance analysis was conducted, the findings should not be generalised beyond urban populations.
- Rather than dismissing the two results as inconsistent, the review seeks to reconcile them by demonstrating that they concern different populations.
- Pending direct evidence for the mechanism, the authors posit that changes in reporting practices produced the apparent trend.
- Before collecting data, the team had to operationalise “social cohesion” by mapping the abstract construct onto observable indicators.
- Although the evidence supports the central argument, the low response rate qualifies the conclusion by narrowing the population to which it can defensibly apply.
- Pre-existing household income, which may independently influence both educational choice and later earnings, is treated as a potential confounding variable.
- Although the report never explicitly claims that causation has been established, its repeated use of “led to” appears to imply precisely that conclusion.
- Although the estimated effect is statistically significant at p < .01, its magnitude is too small to be substantively significant for policy.
- The authors acknowledge that their mutually exclusive coding categories may obscure culturally specific distinctions by collapsing nuanced responses into broad groups.
- The model’s predictions depend on boundary conditions stipulated a priori rather than established empirically.
- By synthesising estimates from several small studies, the meta-analysis aims to derive a more precise pooled effect.

