100 Sentence Starters for Evaluating Sources

100 Sentence Starters for Evaluating Sources

No. Item Definition
1. A gap in the source is Introduces missing information.
2. A key point is Introduces a central point.
3. A likely assumption is Introduces an assumption.
4. A major strength is Introduces a strong feature.
5. A major weakness is Introduces a weak feature.
6. A notable feature is Introduces a distinctive feature.
7. A possible bias is Introduces potential bias.
8. According to the author, Introduces the author’s stated view.
9. An important detail is Introduces a notable detail.
10. One advantage is Introduces a benefit.
11. One concern is Introduces a concern.
12. One drawback is Introduces a downside.
13. One limitation is Introduces a constraint.
14. The argument is strong because Evaluates argument strength.
15. The argument is weak because Evaluates argument weakness.
16. The article explains that Introduces an explanation.
17. The article points out Introduces an important observation.
18. The article reports that Signals reported information.
19. The author acknowledges Shows recognition of a point.
20. The author implies that Signals an implied meaning.
21. The author observes that Introduces a noticed pattern.
22. The author states that Introduces a direct point.
23. The author supports this by Introduces supporting evidence.
24. The author’s purpose is to Introduces the author’s purpose.
25. The author’s tone is Evaluates tone.
26. The central claim is States the key argument.
27. The data show that Points to numerical support.
28. The evidence is credible because Evaluates evidence credibility.
29. The evidence is limited because Evaluates evidence limits.
30. The evidence is weak because Evaluates evidence weakness.
31. The evidence suggests that Signals a conclusion from evidence.
32. The intended audience is Identifies the target audience.
33. The key evidence is Introduces major support.
34. The main idea is States the central point.
35. The passage reveals that Shows what becomes clear.
36. The reasoning is flawed because Evaluates logic problems.
37. The reasoning is sound because Evaluates logic quality.
38. The report concludes that Introduces the report’s conclusion.
39. The source adds context to Shows contextual value.
40. The source aligns with Shows agreement with something.
41. The source appeals to Identifies a rhetorical appeal.
42. The source argues that Presents the source’s main claim.
43. The source assumes Identifies an assumption.
44. The source cites Introduces cited material.
45. The source clarifies Shows added clarity.
46. The source complicates Shows added complexity.
47. The source confirms Shows supporting agreement.
48. The source conflicts with Shows disagreement with something.
49. The source contradicts Shows direct opposition.
50. The source contributes to Shows contribution to understanding.
51. The source does not address Notes an unaddressed issue.
52. The source fails to explain Points out missing explanation.
53. The source focuses on Shows the main focus.
54. The source gives background on Introduces background information.
55. The source helps explain Shows explanatory value.
56. The source includes Introduces included content.
57. The source maintains that Presents a sustained position.
58. The source notes that Highlights a stated detail.
59. The source offers insight into Shows interpretive value.
60. The source omits Introduces omitted content.
61. The source overlooks Identifies something ignored.
62. The source provides context for Introduces contextual support.
63. The source relies on Shows what it depends on.
64. The source strengthens Shows stronger support.
65. The source weakens Shows reduced support.
66. The source’s strength lies in Points to a main strength.
67. The source’s weakness lies in Points to a main weakness.
68. The strongest evidence is Highlights best support.
69. The study found that Reports a research finding.
70. The text asserts that States a firm claim.
71. The text emphasizes Highlights a key point.
72. The text indicates that Shows what the text implies.
73. The weakest evidence is Highlights least convincing support.
74. The writer contends that States an argued position.
75. This article claims that States what the article asserts.
76. This source addresses Introduces addressed issues.
77. This source answers Introduces answered questions.
78. This source demonstrates that Introduces demonstrated point.
79. This source illustrates Shows what it exemplifies.
80. This source is accurate because Begins an accuracy judgment.
81. This source is balanced because Begins a balance judgment.
82. This source is biased because Begins a bias judgment.
83. This source is credible because Begins a credibility judgment.
84. This source is current because Begins a currency judgment.
85. This source is detailed because Begins a depth judgment.
86. This source is limited because Begins a limitation judgment.
87. This source is objective because Begins an objectivity judgment.
88. This source is outdated because Begins a timeliness judgment.
89. This source is relevant because Begins a relevance judgment.
90. This source is reliable because Begins a reliability judgment.
91. This source is strong because Begins a strength judgment.
92. This source is useful because Begins a usefulness judgment.
93. This source is weak because Begins a weakness judgment.
94. This source matters because Begins a significance judgment.
95. This source reflects Shows what it mirrors.
96. This source reveals Introduces revealed information.
97. This source shows that Introduces shown point.
98. This source stands out because Begins a distinction judgment.
99. This source suggests that Presents a likely interpretation.
100. What is missing here is points out omission